Good team leader

For a technology company, especially for the whole engineering team, a strong technology leaders is crucial. So in the end it should be consistent with what standard?

Team

Excellent technology leaders tend to see themselves as part of a team, their success can only be built on the success of the team. Nobody is willing to do their job, put the team in the way of a road barriers I want to clean up by them, so that the entire team can open enough horsepower to 100% of his ability to be smart as all team members will all play out, to ensure that current thinking about the team level is not limited to one or two people's minds.

Bad science and technology leader often very tall, very high-profile way to demonstrate their, only those who can give him immediate fame thing to give him enough momentum to let him have the will to do it. He will form cliques, to engage in their own small groups can benefit significantly for some projects, but the entire team of engineers set to disregard the interests of.

Science and technology foresight

Outstanding scientific and technological leader in technology research and development direction often above product has a very clear judgment, while ensuring that each team member can know what it is. He will be sub-area product features to men who do so they have the greatest decision-making power. he believes the team is smart, trustworthy, let go of the project will be the most important part of discretionary grant men.

Bad science and technology leader in research related to the above directions refused to do too much explanation and clarification, but the command. He put the team wisdom locked in the minds of everyone, will not create some useful documents distributed to let everyone circulated.

Discussion and debate

Excellent technology leaders to listen and encourage debate. When the team can not afford to come out from the debate, he will re-sort the speculative process and framework to help them out of the quagmire argue. He tends not to pre-set position involved in the debate, often encouraged everyone to express their views, the ideas are on the table for discussion.

Bad technology leaders often make endless debate continues, so that team productivity severely disrupted. Some leaders will prematurely end debate away, often say is "the problem has been handling , and do not need to dwell too much on this issue. "bad science and technology leaders tend to think that they can win the debate is the most important, its importance is far more than the right decision.

Project management

Outstanding scientific and technological leaders are often one step ahead. They have been developed to ensure that the established track, with a bold speculation, rigorous argument a step by step to build R & D milestone in the process. They think possible problems in advance, the "problem" has not really become a "problem" that they will be resolved before they can find out all sorts of technical bottleneck exists, and led the team to bypass them. they can be confirmed duplication, or from local conflicts, to find that this It should place more attention to these areas bring more R & D resources.

Bad science and technology leaders are passive. They may be authorized, but did nothing to follow the established route. They do not know to establish a number of small targets in the process in the hope that eventually things can happen overnight. They just wait, just the need for "end-to-end" test to the final complex systems. they let men put a lot of time wasted on some of the important content of the work. even these will be easy to arouse people's interest.

Pragmatism

Outstanding scientific and technological leaders often can "get things done" and "get things done" to find just the right balance between their always timely shots to solve the problem at a critical time, This is not out of laziness procrastination, contrary It embodied their superb ability to improvise. they always encouraged his team to find some of the most favorable moment shortcut to solve hinder the overall progress of research and development projects of all kinds of obstacles in the shortest possible time to develop out of the smallest viable framework advertised. for a good leader in science and technology, the essential details. code quality, code review, testing with the release time is just as important.

Bad leaders cut corners, but in the short term saving time, but in the long run but planted all sorts of problems, especially in technology piled up higher and higher above the "debt." When they were unable to identify what needs resourceful, when you need excellence.

communicate with

Outstanding scientific and technological leaders know their role is not just limited to writing code, the ability to communicate is equally important. The time spent with the team members on the exchange, to maximize its value, sometimes even willing to sacrifice their own work to improve the efficiency of the team's productivity.

The only bad science and technology leadership is reflected in the value of the programming, that the communication is distracting things. They will not for the sake of the team overall productivity, but think of doing for themselves finding the greatest benefit. If they did realize that they have to take the time to go with the team, they will feel in frustration.

Relations with the product

Good science and technology leader and product manager and designer closely around the "work product is what the right" to discuss their own views are not afraid of being overthrown, because the heart has a clear direction, product development objectives to be accomplished , it has been able to maintain an open mind. If you encounter a technical bottleneck, they will find out another path to bypass it, which often involve technical input less. good leaders make designer goods and product managers know what these technical difficulties is to let each within the area of ​​responsibility can do appropriate compromise, compromise come out.

Bad science and technology leaders did not assume their responsibility, just throw all product decisions will fall to "the wall" on to see which can "hang" at the top. If you ran into technical difficulties, they often have no idea other way.

Toughness

Good science and technology leaders often hold variables appearing in a calm state of mind, they can better respond to various changes in the product that appears above the performance they can expect to where there will be changes, and design your own code to deal with.

Bad science and technology leader in product performance specification change occurs when the deeply depressed.

Character

Good leaders are good to get along with science and technology, but also hold strong views, a firm stand. When faced with bad science and technology leader feedback, it tends to immediately switch to the "defense form." They are eager to own title to exude a "authoritative" light harvesting "respectable" in the eyes. and good leaders often buried very evil looking for better ways to enhance their modesty, the members continued to muster refueling. arrogance is bad science and technology leader the harvest in men humbled enough to lament the joy and pride.